I recently ran across a blog regarding Kyudo entitled The Death of an Art by Miles with Meaning. For those that know me well, you know that nothing will get me on my soapbox quicker than someone wanting to do for kyudo what was done for karate in the West.
He makes some valid points in his writing. He begins by extolling the beauty of kyudo. I don’t believe anyone could argue with that, although there are those I am sure that cannot appreciate this beauty.
He goes on to say:
It is a dying art and one that may not be around in 20 years or so.
Why would an art that has been around for thousands of years, be on a path of extinction? The answer is a lack of instructors. . . or so it appears on the surface. The real problem is with the teaching and ranking system of Kyudo.
Most other arts require 4-7 years to achieve black belt level. After another 2 or so, one can achieve second degree status. It is usually at the 2nd or 3rd dan that individuals begin to teach. Not so with Kyudo.
Kyudo requires that one achieves 5th dan status. . .before they begin a program to learn how to teach. By the time the smoke clears, one is looking at nearly double the lengths listed above. As such, they are basically killing their own art via their requirements. Even worse, they are at the point whereby no one even cares if such happens. It reminds me of the person who sells 8-track tapes in 2009. Maybe a collector or 2 will purchase “The Doors Live at the Hollywood Bowl” on 8 track but basically, no one wants this format.
From the rest of the article, I gather he asked to study kyudo repeatedly and was turned away. While this is regretted, I don’t believe in changing the format so that we wind up with a watered down version of kyudo. He states that after asking 40 to 50 times, by the 60th time the person has given up . He sees that in the past, instructors have kept the “secret” of their art to themselves and and that art has died with its Masters.
Several points should be made here. Firstly, the time frame for advancement in rank is different for karate and kyudo. If you are on the fast track in karate, you may achieve black belt rank in as little as three years. In kyudo, with hard work, one may achieve shodan after one year. This fast progression tends to slow as rank increases and the judges are looking for more depth and precision in your development.
Federation kyudo is governed in Japan. They send a select group of Hanchi-dan to countries around the world to conduct testing, or one may travel to Japan. This ensures the standards of the art are upheld. While there are other styles of kyudo that do not adhere to the policy of testing, which I respect, testing in this fashion helps to make sure the true spirit of kyudo is not lost.
Karate has no governing board. Those signatures on the black belt certificates may or may not mean anything. Whose standards are you living up to when you received it? The person that trained you and maybe the instructors that he trained? Granted, I am sure there are good schools out there that haven’t let the draw of promoting students for cash blind them, but then again, way too many have.
I have often thought of writing an article on The Raping of a Martial Art. I have debated whether this is a little harsh. I don’t think so. So, many schools have become little more than baby sitting services. Don’t get me wrong, even at the worst, it is probably a good thing. It keeps the kids active, it is a good social network, and they have fun. But are we teaching martial arts? Are we creating a false sense of confidence in many students that the techniques they are doing will work in a real life situation? Are we teaching the heart of the martial arts? Or, have we let the draw of more money darken our hearts? When the term McDojo becomes part of our language, then we have a problem!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDojo
As with most things, there are many considerations and these need to be addressed. Yes, we need to promote kyudo. In Japan, it is taught as a class in the high schools. No, not all of the students will continue with it, but at least they have that opportunity. It is sad when you see someone that would like to pursue the art and is refused. If they turn away, it would be preferable that they turned away of their own accord. If not given the opportunity, what talents are there that may remain untouched? What if the Michael Jordan’s of the world had never even seen or picked up a basketball?
There are those that care deeply. The answer lies in the delicate balance of promoting kyudo without destroying its purity. If we westernise kyudo, as karate has been, kyudo would become little more than Western Archery. This, to me, would be the true Death of an Art.
Read Full Post »